Olli Tammilehdon kirjoituksia

Suomeksi/In Finnish

Search on this site:

If you want to receive information about updates of this site, write here your name and email address and click the send button.

Finland and the Mystery of Elite Capture

1. Finland’s Irrational Choice

States are generally thought to pursue their own security and economic interests. However, in recent years, several European countries have made decisions that are clearly against their own interests but promote US interests. For example, Finland has concluded a so-called Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA) with the United States. According to the agreement, the U.S. can build 15 military bases inside existing bases of the Finnish Army.According to the agreement, the U.S. get access to 15 existing Finnish military bases and can build its own bases inside them. One of them will be in Lapland, close to Russia’s main nuclear submarine base. By making Finland the first target of Russian missiles and increasing tensions between the two nuclear powers, the DCA endangers Finland’s security. Instead, the agreement promotes the long-term aspirations of the US administration, or deep state, which is independent of presidential changes. These include preventing the rise of rival great powers and related attempts to encircle, destabilize and weaken Russia.¹

Germany and many other European countries have switched from Russian natural gas to much more expensive US natural gas, which has led to economic hardship in Europe but big profits in the US. Recently, the European NATO countries decided to raise their military spending to 5% of their GDP. Since these countries do not have large arms manufacturing capacities, this decision is a goldmine for the US military-industrial complex. At the same time, it increases the likelihood of a military confrontation between the U.S. and Russiamilitary confrontation between the US and Russia. Unless the war escalates into a full-scale nuclear war, it would not be fought in North America but in Europe.

0. Elite Capture

Why do our continent’s leaders behave in such strange ways? In a recent article “Elite Capture & European Self-Destruction: The Hidden Architecture of Transatlantic Hegemony” sheds light on this mystery” Nel Bonillaarticle, “Elite Capture & European Self-Destruction: The Hidden Architecture of Transatlantic Hegemony,” Nel Bonilla² highlights how the German political elite has been made to identify with US interests instead of their own countryidentify with US interests instead of those of their own country. Organizations such as the Atlantik-Brücke, the Atlantic Institute, the German Marshall Fund and the Fulbright Program have been essential in this work. They have trained German leaders and created a certain way of producing information, a system of selecting leaders and an elite network. A dominant mindset has emerged that sets strict limits on political imagination. Pro-US sentiment has been driven into the elite’s spine, as it were. The US mentality instilled in the elite is reinforced and a common strategy outlined every

The United States has practiced such elite capture around the world. It is an essential part of the social technology that promotes US power. And the exercise of this kind of power is old. President Woodrow Wilson’s Secretary of State, Robert Lansing, stated already in 1924:Robert Lansing, who had served as President Woodrow Wilson’s Secretary of State, stated as early as 1924 in a letter attributed to him:: “We must open the doors of our universities to young, ambitious Mexicans and make the effort to educate them in the American way of life, in our values, and in respect for the leadership of the United States. Mexico will need competent administrators, and over time, these young people will come to occupy important positions and will eventually take possession of the presidency itself. And without the United States having to spend a single cent or fire a single shot, they will do what we want, and do it better and more radically than we ourselves could have done.”³

In addition to universities, foreign elites or those aspiring to be their member have been immersed in American "values" within the framework of various courses and visiting programsforeign elites, or those aspiring to join them, have been immersed in American "values" through various courses and visitor programs. One such program is the US State Department's IVLP program (International Visitor Leadership Program)International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP). Hundreds of people who have gone through it have later reached the position of prime minister or president in their own countries. From Finland, this group includes president Sauli Niinistö, president Tarja HalonenPresident Sauli Niinistö, President Tarja Halonen and all the prime ministers between 1987 and 2014 with one exception.⁴

0. Alexander Stubb

One particular Finnish leader who entered the political scene thoroughly steeped in “American values” is Alexander Stubb. He himself talks about this process extensively in his autobiographical interview book “Alex”⁵. Stubb was an exchange student in the USA during high school and studied social sciences at a US university. He admits that his way of thinking became more American herehis way of thinking became more American there. Later, Stubb studied at the European University in BrugesStubb studied at the College of Europe in Bruges, which required French. There he became friends with an American named Valerie Plame. She always passed her exams, even though she did not speak French very well. Plame kept in touch with Stubb long after her studies. In 2003, it was revealed that Plame was a CIA agent.⁶

Five years later, Stubb was the foreign minister of non-aligned Finlandforeign minister of nonaligned Finland and participated in the armistice and peace negotiations for the Georgian War. Apparently, he actually represented the United States in the negotiations, as US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was in constant contact with Stubb – even while he was running the Helsinki City Marathon.⁷

The Soviet Union had similar efforts to infuse the candidates for political leadership positions with its own "values". However, they were very modest compared to the US efforts and were mainly limited to members of communist parties. Yet, young leaders from almost all Finnish parties were invited to visit the USSR, but the function of visits was probably mainly to separate the wheat from the chaff: who were ready to repeat regardless of the situation the then "NATO liturgy" of that time, i.e. the flattery of the Soviets, and who were not.

In 1977, I managed to get to such a visit, even though I did not belong to any political youth organization. Our delegation was cultivating friendships at a student labor camp that was building a giant cowhouse in the Tula regionbuilding a giant cowshed in the Tula region without tools larger than shovels. Two Social Democrats and I were singled out like chaff when we dared to ask why our stay at the camp had suddenly been extended by a week. The leader of the delegation, Marjo Hirsimäki from the Center Party, the leader of our subgroup from the National Coalition Party (main right-wing party to which Stubb belonged before his presidency), and many other Finns in the camp deeply resented our bad behavior. They proved to be such good friends of the Soviets. Hirsimäki distinguished himself in this matter, because he went to the Soviet embassy in Helsinki to apologize for our inappropriate questions.

If the Soviet Union had not collapsed, its skills in integrating Finnish politicians would likely have improved. Then young men like Stubb, aspiring to a career in leadership, would have been immersed in a completely different set of “values.

07/31/26